OUGD401 | STUDY TASK 6 | HOW TO WRITE CORRECTLY

For this study task we must take at least 2 dissertations from upstairs in the library and observe the form, punctuation, grammar, tone-of-voice, referencing, vocabulary. In performing this task we will be able to explore different writing styles, and although each dissertation will not be perfect, it will be beneficial when writing our own piece.

I chose two dissertations that were relevant to my own Context of Practice essay; relating to gender.

The first was by Ceara Elliot, titled "The function of female representation in British World War One and Two propaganda" (2011/12). The introduction is immediately very clear, demonstrating use of declarative structures and modal verbs e.g "I will". This sets a formal discourse for the piece from the beginning. The introduction is separated into paragraphs describing what will be discussed in each chapter, showing organization.

Each chapter also begins with a selection of declarative sentences, sustaining the formal tone and organization. Throughout the dissertation the use of references are lengthy but seem essential in order to support findings. They seem to be referenced relatively well.

The grammar and punctuation used does successfully convey a formal discourse, as there are no use of contractions within the chapters which would demonstrate a conversational discourse, which could be interpreted as informal. In my opinion, a dissertation should possibly maintain a formal tone throughout. 

The second dissertation I picked out was by Claudia Griffin, titled "Can women's magazines, focusin on Cosmopolitan (UK edition), ever be considered feminist?" (2012/13) This dissertation caught my eye as it contains some similar themes to my own Context of Practice essay. 

The introduction is interesting and challenges the subjectivity of feminism, suggesting that there could be different types of feminism as apparently it does not have an objective meaning. I am unsure if I agree with what is said in the introduction, but using different points of views and opinions is a successful method to draw a reader in. Again, like the first piece I explored, there are clear use of declaratives which establish the correct formal tone.

The referencing is short and to the point throughout the dissertation. It stays relevant to the subject whilst not being too long, as perhaps the first piece was. Each reference seems to be labelled correctly and supports her evidence and findings. It adds depth to the piece.

The three things I have learned from observing other dissertations is to always use a formal discourse, as this is something that can sometimes accidentally slip. It is important that the dissertation remains in a formal tone, in order to be consistent. I have also learned that the introduction is a vital part of the dissertation. It is extremely important to structure it correctly and introduce different sentence structures to convey a 'matter-of-fact' tone of voice. I have finally learned that research plays a huge role in the quality of a written piece, without any material to back up your findings, it could be said to make the entire piece weak. A strong dissertation is filled with references and research that can successfully support your own words.